Skip to content

Add peerdns and check_link_down for dynamic interfaces; add logic for… - #75

Merged
razorsedge merged 2 commits into
razorsedge:developfrom
esalberg:check_link
Oct 7, 2015
Merged

Add peerdns and check_link_down for dynamic interfaces; add logic for…#75
razorsedge merged 2 commits into
razorsedge:developfrom
esalberg:check_link

Conversation

@esalberg

@esalberg esalberg commented Oct 7, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

… blank ipaddress, network, gateway to remove extra entries from ifcfg file; minor lint and comments cleanup

… blank ipaddress, network, gateway to remove extra entries from ifcfg file; minor lint and comments cleanup
@esalberg

esalberg commented Oct 7, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Re-requested against develop.

@esalberg esalberg mentioned this pull request Oct 7, 2015
@razorsedge razorsedge self-assigned this Oct 7, 2015
@esalberg

esalberg commented Oct 7, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I realized that I did not have the updated template logic to handle blank ( '' ) macaddress entries from network_bond_static and network_bond_dynamic without having an empty HWADDR= line. Since I already had the same template patch here for the the other three affected template entries, I did a second commit to add HWADDR.

I checked the spec, and I don't think anything there needs updating.

Please let me know if you need me either to pull the template changes into a separate pull request (I'd prefer not for the extra work, but I understand why I might need to do that :) ), or if you need me to squash the commits.

@esalberg

esalberg commented Oct 7, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I just noticed that develop was updated - just let me know if my update here needs to be moved. :)

@razorsedge

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Does commit f5b1bd4 address PRs #42 and #69?

@razorsedge
razorsedge merged commit f5b1bd4 into razorsedge:develop Oct 7, 2015
@esalberg
esalberg deleted the check_link branch July 29, 2016 16:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants